A man has recently been ordered to pay a total of $80,000 in car accident claim damages to a pair of personal injury victims who were seriously hurt in a car accident in 1992. He’s been warned by the judges from the Court of the Queen’s Bench in Alberta that he is unable to defend himself against the allegations or to reverse their validity in anyway. He must pay out the $80,000 for the injuries noted in the car accident claim writ. The offending driver, Maurice Riendeau, who was responsible for the car accident which happened in 1992, caused serious personal injuries to Arlene Helen Zawaski and Shawn Bruce McNamara. The latter claimant was riding as a passenger in the former claimant’s car when the accident took place.
The two victims of the car accident launched a car accident claim against the offending driver who was later noted as being in default. The offending driver did not defend himself against the claim-serving notice and he was noted in default in personal injury action which arose from his negligent driving in the September 1992 car accident. Due to the lack of response, the administrator consented to and paid the judgements which were entered against the offending driver, seeing $35,159 paid out to Zawaski and $44,888 going to McNamara.
The administrator later went on to file renewal actions with a view to recoup the payments invoiced for the personal injury judgements, an action which was prompted by Riendeau filing a request to win back the $500 payment which he made for court costs when the car accident claim was settled in 2006-2007. Statements of defence against the car accident claim judgements were filed by the offender, making counter-claims against the administrator. His requests were dismissed by the administrator after he sought summary judgements on the case. The requests were dismissed on the basis that it was too late to reverse and the court’s judgement on the car accident claim cases had already been finalised. The judges at the Court of the Queen’s Bench in Albert were in full support of the administrator in this matter.
Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Justice D.R.G. Thomas stated for the court that they were entirely satisfied that the “circumstances of this particular case warrant the application of the doctrine of res judicata [a legal term referring to a matter already adjudicated],” He went on to state that “further, there is evidence that the amount of $500 was paid by Riendeau on the Zawaski judgement on Mar. 21, 2006. That is evidence that he recognized and accepted the validity of the Zawaski and McNamara judgements. He is now estopped [prevented] from challenging their validity on the basis of this one payment, notwithstanding his claim that he had to make the payment to renew his Alberta driver’s licence.”
Jim Loxley is a Director at personal injury compensation claim specialist, My Compensation. More information on compensation claims of all types can be found on the My Compensation website.
{ 0 comments }

